Aristotelian Justice – A Study By Artur Victoria

activity Government City-State. In turn, the repair of a situation caused by an individual who violated the law or establishing a relationship of parity between litigants are the ideas of corrective justice, in close liaison with the judicial function of the city-state, not However, it may exceptionally be delegated to private individuals when exercising their rights. In particular, Aristotle’s thought has a different perception of cultural property called trial. The Nicomachean Ethics, described the trial as a global understanding of man, which was formed from the perception of what is fair. Equity, in turn is based on truth. According to the philosopher, rightly, to judge is to judge according to truth.

For better assimilation of matter, which represents the thinking of the philosopher about his theory of corrective justice, through the following scheme:

The line-as the reason) (corrective justice MORAL EXCELLENCE
(PRODUCT QUALITY BACKGROUND OF THE ACTION AS HUMAN CAPITAL CONSIDERATION AS EFFECTIVE)

Different-scientific knowledge LOW-philosophical wisdom

Therefore, it is a special kind of discernment credit converges to a natural one, the judge bowed wide, as an older person who has acquired through the proper understanding of intelligence, of course, brought by experiential learning. The philosophy that has no such natural origin.

Aristotle says no one is a philosopher by nature. What then is the discernment? When he answered the wisdom of the soul is the provision related to what is fair.

As additional analysis, Perelman’s victory, the latter informs us that Plato shows a clear preference for a concept of justice that is grounded in

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6