question.
Lack of evidence for such a presumed causality renders the choice between belief and disbelief inevitable.
It is because of lack of evidence that the choice is subject to persuasive and dissuasive factors that decide the final decision.Persuasive and dissuasive factors become as complex and multiple as there can be humans and thoughts.
Every single thing, object, phenomenon, event or concert of objects and events play a role in the final decision of the individual person to believe or to reject belief.
What is more surprising is that the same phenomena can be used in support for the arguments of both believers and disbelievers alike. Gnostics and agnostics, theists and atheists as use the same argument for their points of view, defending and attacking the other side point of view. The cross-sectional rectangular stone is simply ‘lack of evidence’ for either belief or disbelief.
To attempt such a schematic typology would be an exercise in futility. Nevertheless; the exercise is perhaps worthwhile view the difficulty and importance of the question.
One way to do it we can divide up peoples convictions according to their constituent systems. A human being is a total enigma in which no answer is given yet as to his presence, reason of being, origin and finality. Accepting the multifaceted composition of man we can admit what is commonly known namely, the physical, the psychological, the mental and the spiritual (for some) aspects. We should not forget the moral, instinctive, ethical, para-psychological and aesthetical aspects.
It should be clear that we consider here that man has to make a choice between belief and disbelief and this is inescapable.