Question by KILLER !!: If I offered you a million dollors but you had to give up sex for good.. no self serving either. Would you?
accept?
lets say, there is a way we can make sure u never ever ever play with yourself either. lets assume there is a magical trick that will disable you from ever having sex of any kind.
would u take the million dollars?
i would take the million dollars.. if I can still continue to hug and have the same feeling.
thats nuff for me
Best answer:
Answer by ???? g??ƒƒ?? ?? ?? g??????™
Yeah, I’ll have to pass on that offer… thanks though!
Add your own answer in the comments!
Yeah I actually would o.o
Hell NO!
haha no way.
save that one million for yourself-.-
not for a million dollars, no.
Not worth it.
Well at my current age, I would have to pass. If you asked me when I was, say 50, I might take you up on that! At 24 though, no way. I love my adult time with my husband. That in itself is worth a million dollars…
erm maybe depending on the age 😛
Not for any amount of money
aahaha no probably not.
nope i cannot sacrifice masturbation and erection for a million $$$$
never
not unless i needed the money for a specific reason like paying for cancer treatment for a loved one.. though i could try find the money. i don’t think i could give it up for anything :’)
When I am married I want kids so no.
I’m 13 so no! But you can offer me this again when I’m 55 🙂
I wouldn’t take your million dollars.
YES ,now give me the money.
Gimme me da money!
A million bucks isn’t that much. Complete abstinence from ALL sexual contact is nearly impossible, and there are several alleged physical detriments from such a lifestyle. In example, there are many instances of this from medical journals, but just from Wikipedia:
“[T]he British Medical Journal found that “men who reported the highest frequency of orgasm enjoyed a death rate half that of the laggards”. The report also cited other studies to show that having sex even a few times a week may be associated with the following: improved sense of smell; reduced risk of heart disease; weight loss and overall fitness; reduced depression (in women); the relief or lessening of pain; less frequent colds and flu; better bladder control; better teeth; and improved prostate function. The report cited a study published by the British Journal of Urology International which indicated that men in their 20s can reduce by a third their chance of getting prostate cancer by ejaculating more than five times a week[.]”
A 50% reduction in death, a 33% reduction in prostate cancer (in men), and an overall greater sense of happiness isn’t worth a million bucks, especially considering inflation. If it’s only for monetary gain and you don’t get any benefit from religious obligation, it’s clearly not worth it. For more information, use google scholar or a similar service to look up correlations between ejaculation, prostate cancer, and death.
And for those of you that say you would probably do it later in life, that’s also not beneficial. Sexual activity continues basically until death, and sexual gratification actually increases as you get older:
“[I]t appears men in their 50’s are more satisfied with their sex lives than men in their thirties and forties. The survey asked 1185 men between the ages of 20 and 79 about their sex life with questions about their sex drive, quality of erections and ejaculation…The highest level of satisfaction with their sex lives was recorded among men in their twenties with an overall satisfaction level of 2.79. the second highest level was for men in their fifties who responded with a satisfaction level of 2.77.”
The same survey found that though sexual satisfaction decreased once you hit your 60s and 70s, that doesn’t mean you stop. In fact, many seniors continue their sex lives until death. Just because you don’t want to think about it doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. You don’t realize you’re potentially giving up 60 years of sex/sex acts…
Wow… Well, I’m only 14, and I’m a virgin, so… GIVE ME MY MILLION DOLLARS!!!!
Ask me again in three or four years though and my answer might change… >.>