the ruling tribes of Israel, Jesus begins to emerge with all his eccentricities, as a very correct and unperturbed pacifistic, freedom fighter, intent on achieving his goals in a very calculated and psychological way. This is the way any Sufi or Asian guru would go about spreading dissent and pointing the way. Perhaps Jesus´s father instilled the sense of futility of the sword as a means of conquest and perhaps then we can understand what he meant when he tried to make it clear that the destruction and rebuilding of the Temple was a thing of the mind and heart and not a physical concept. It must be remembered that the stones and mortar were Herodian and possibly Roman and anyone attempting to damage them was an instant sacrifice. It was after all one of the ways the priesthood hoped to enlist the aid of Rome to remove a popular teacher, without alerting their own tribal members. Jesus wanted his people, (who now covered most of the ancient world), to stand up and be noticed – to mix with their brother revolutionaries and follow the lead to the nation of nations that Alexander had carved out before him, in the name of Israel. Alexander, I must repeat was a Royal Messianic name and in many ways he did what any warrior Messiah would have done. The name actually means liberator anointed, according to the most prominent of the etymologists of the 19th. Century. In that Messianic context, Jesus did succeed, but it seems that the inner core of spiritual values, he preached with great fervour, were not to survive. Alexander is always depicted with a chain around his neck from which hangs a heart. This symbol of love was also the symbol of all ancient love tribes, including the Phoenicians and Etruscans. It was also analogous with the Rose, which