Lesbians Rule!

Leadership Roles” is less than genuine.

It seems at a first glance that it is nothing more than an attempt to ignore the postulate of an authentic female and simply to clone her into a traditionally contrived male niche.

For example male prejudice has it that the traditional Chinese symbol for universal unity the yin-yang is a male-female entity however the disproportion of the two opposing sides rule to the contrary.

This symbol is more convincingly and cogent lecture is without a doubt symbolising of two females in union.

But the male counter transcendentalism, wants to always see himself at the expense of the female.

You have to really believe in this so called inequality of women; pretending to realise the mannequin apparently much easier than ones proper potentiality.

This generally accepted conclusion might however prove true if when equality is gauged proportionally to arrogant men, the operator in this case is arrogance.

The equality of women in question is that of women who thus aspire to be equal to arrogant men whom the infallibly hold in esteem and since the symmetrical antithesis of arrogance is ignorance this will effectively yield an ignorant woman.

Further in response to the United Nations theme “Violence against women: How can we overcome this persistent human rights violation?”

The response must be; given any situation where a woman is not completely happy; order, nation, company or marriage, she simply needs to exercise her right of veto.

The beauty here is that the woman can and must decide without the need of a man to intervene, moreover if there is any fear

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30