Lesbians Rule!

reproduction radicalizes each human act towards total specificity.

Who says species says; taxonomic specificity, which is like saying; the thing and itself, animal reproduction reinforces specificity, but for the human this means himself only being a radicalism contained ontology in a sort of complete autarchy.

Further applying the concept of symmetry to what constitutes the ontology of male specialisation implies that the female ontological equivalent would be not so much a specialisation but a generalisation.

The Creation is efficient of the individual, but strangely enough the individual in order to be countenanced before a scrutinizing society has to be doubled up into a convenient conjugation, a sort of nitrification.

The one partner marriage fallacy appears to be just another hangover of a domineering male imposition, which is not more than symbolic within species of the animal realm.

The average human is invited to reproduce some zoological conformity in order to demonstrate social acceptation similar to a sort of pheromone contiguity amongst certain insects of a given colony.

For cognitive variance to transcend there must exhibit to the extreme a definite sexual alterity this means that there is no male cognitive articulation of the male without knowledge of the female and vice versa this is efficacious since the male and female as conceptual entities are symmetrical; you cannot have one without the other.

The problem with marriage is that the male cannot understand the female unless he has access to all females; his comprehension is inhibited when limited to a mere aspect.

3.3

Modern

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30