Lesbians Rule!

deficient being as it were extruded by the more perfect.

Genetic symbiosis eliminating the ever so frequent mistakes: babies joined at the head etc…?

Moreover; if hybridization generates a healthier person, heterogamous reproduction in so far as for humans, is in fact counter optimal.

If in fact hybridization does indeed put back the female so to speak then this reveals that since the onset of all those people since say Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon were in fact doing it wrong and that they might have only been contributing to the plethora of disease when they could have been better defining the human.

Theoretically parthenogenesis eventually and astonishingly implies evolutionary efficacy, this since a healthier person is the result.

It might seem a priori that technical intervention proves somewhat unnatural?

With this the reply might be said that; what is unnatural in the animal realm is perfectly natural in the human realm.

Or what is natural in the animal realm is semiotic transcendentalism in the human realm.

Technique yielding testament to human ingenuity, women can finally possess their own aetiology and logic.

It should be noted here that this analysis is not novel, that Simone de Beauvoir has said the same thing somewhat differently.

The logical implication is important; without parthenogenesis female generation is impotent and illusory.

Justifiably it can be implied that the female genome is a by-product of male sexual input and has for effect to segregate ad infinitum the female into a multiplicity of aspect and not always with a beneficial

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30