Options Trading – Position Trading

Williams or 1+21 as used by numerous traders) yields the same results.

Ok. It all looks great. However, E. Nayman et al., seem to have circumvented the MA intersection chief secret, through which traders suffer constant losses: a “lighter” MA has crossed a “heavier” one, say, upwards, but… thereafter there is sharp downturn resulting in the MAs intersection again.

Fig. 6. GBPUSD H1 chart as of April, 21-26, 2005. (See Note below)

A fivefold reciprocating crossing of MA 21 and 55. You are welcome to calculate traders’ losses.

Now, let’s call it a day with examples. The MA intersection technique operates perfectly in certain circumstances, while turning out impotent in others, thus inflicting losses upon traders. No criteria have ever been stipulated by Forex scholars as to entries to be effected pro- or counter-divergence of moving averages.

3. MACD construction and analysis. What sort of secret may one expect from the following statement of Nayman’s: “a subsequent high being lower than the preceding one suggests a bullish trend depletion or even its changing with the same being visa versa under minimum MACD values”. Much of a secret, isn’t it? I thought it were the MACD operation principle, familiar to any Forex novice. The secret-fancier B. Williams hasn’t even taken effort to advise to perform inputs change from 9, 12, 26 into 5, 34, 5 to provide for a lag killer.

Assuming the above, authentic MACD secrets are not paid any attention to by scholar, which fact inflicts losses upon traders. The situation comes into effect, when upon a divergence formation, no trend change is observed with another same-trend wave taking place instead.

Fig. 7. GBPUSD H1 chart as of April, 2005,

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13