Refuting another video by this user…. The Quran says nothing good about Christians? What about this verse which the user didn’t quote: 005.082 YUSUFALI: Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou find those who say, “We are Christians”: because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant. YUSUFALI: Those who believe (in the Qur’an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. YUSUFALI: Then, in their wake, We followed them up with (others of) Our messengers: We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy. But the Monasticism which they invented for themselves, We did not prescribe for them: (We commanded) only the seeking for the Good Pleasure of Allah; but that they did not foster as they should have done. Yet We bestowed, on those among them who believed, their (due) reward, but many of them are rebellious transgressors.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Hell is real. Hell is not real. Everyone has something to say. Who is right? Well, it impossible to know for sure. Where do we start? Lets put the idea of Hell to the test. Is the idea of a literal Hell – a horrific destination for unbelievers – consistent with the concept of a Just and Loving God? To those who think that a literal Hell makes sense – I hope you will gain a perspective that will help you realize that Hell is pointless and thus represents a fictional idea. In either case, I welcome your input. Some points of my argument are: 1. A minor side point: Adam ate the “apple” (fruit of knowledge) not knowing YET good and evil. He was so dumb he didn’t even know he was naked. He was no more responsible for his choice than a child that tragically plays with a shiny blade or a live hand grenade. Whatever consequences of his action are, be it the tough living outside of paradise or knowledge of good and evil propagating to his children – punishment by Hell (plus the one that afflicts by default his descendants ) is disproportionate. 2. Setup for the main point: The world is not divided into “A” (Believers) and “B” (Non-believers) – those who accept and those who reject. There is a HUGE other category that is often ignored. Call it “C” – those who never heard about Jesus, Adam, Hell, etc. They never had the option to believe. They are people too. And they make up most of the population that ever lived on Earth. They are just as capable of belief as those who heard the …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
why are almost all male muslims on youtube fat, bearded, ugly and angry at everything all the time?
@AhmadiyyatZB
Actually sir the Quran never mentions the word Trinity. Only in mistranslations would we find this term
Hmm I don’t recall that, maybe he shouldn’t have called his video Quran against Christians, seems like an ignorant statement to me. If he did say those things, then that is fine, however the evidence in my video still stands regardless.
Ozzy you didn’t Listen, he said there were 3 Neutral Christian Verses, 5 Good and 7 Bad.
Kiss Jew’s ass you islam losser, Lol!! It’s fun!!!hahahaha
Mashaullah, u are writing good arguments bro, keep posting and give Ahsan tabligh, not for this liar christian man, but for the general public. I have met hundreds of good Christian bro & sisters but I haven’t seen such a pethatic liar as this man AhmadQuran3 is. He is so called Arabic Philosopher but as a matter of fact he is a complete idiot and a typical Jahil who object for the sake of objection only with hundreds of lies added up due to his own screwed up mentality.
AhmadQuran3 also says tt Mohammad’s name is not in old testement.let me accept this notion to b true 4 a while but my question to this man is tt :does God everytieme mentions the physical sketch of every new coming prophet in preious relgious books?Ws Jesus’ name was written in the Old testement as yeshua/Joshua wt the bold faced letters? or did bible called him SON OF MARY?Of course not,yet his metaphoric name was written and tt was MESSIAH.And Jews used to mock at him by calling him Messaih!
Also ask this Bad-Mouthed Christian who calls himself AhmadQuran3 that If u couldn’t find Mohammad’s name as Ahmad,thn find the Metaphric name tt exectly matches him. And our Ulemas prove that his name was mentioned in Old testament, but attributive name. This man blocks every such person who argues against his wish.When this pathatic liar,AhamadQuran3, finds that someone out there is exposing his lies,he does his dirty job and blocks the person.A typical screwed up man he is.
I don’t deny that the Quran commands believers NOT to hold belief in the Trinity. But the concept of the Trinity from a Christian point of view is not 3 Gods but 1 God, I think that was the point I was trying to make. Peace
pls correct yourself. Quran says that trinity is the biggest sin. It is actually SHIRK. May be no harm correcting yourself
Mashullah bro, keep posting your videos
I am contending a person who THINKS he knows what he is talking about, but if you actually understood the issue at hand you would understand the context in which I am refuting this particular hater here on youtube. Don’t try coming into a ongoing situation without having FULL knowledge of said situation. That makes YOU look VERY egotistical.
I have no idea how you come to this conclusion based on just THIS ONE video of mine. How dare you judge me based on how I view comparative religion, when you do not even know me. Watch my earlier videos, or even some of my video dealing with the New Testament, that HAS NOTHING to do with Islam. This video of course is defending an attack on the religion of Islam, but that does not mean I view ALL faiths when studying comparative religion through “Islamic lenses”.
Again, quality vs. quantity.
Your age is not the issue. So, ego is getting in the way because of the subjectivity.
Comparitive Religious study is usually an objective pursuit, not subjective.
Your argument in the video is clearly against someone who does not even have 3 yrs of study and you are contesting their lack of knowledge. Now thats EGO!
Good luck comparing things.
I’ve would of been impressed had you provided quality instead of quantity in terms of knowledge.
As an Islamic Appologist, you are not objective in any area of Comparitive Religions except to interpret religions through Islamic lenses.
Sorry I don’t let my EGO get in the way of having discussion about comparative religion. I am only 19. But yes have been studying comparative religion on a Academic level for 3 years, but I have been studying it as a subject for about 6 years.
Three years? Thats all? LOL
Blind faith? RIght. Actually my view comes from three years of studying comparative religion.
And your assuming they were not.
What makes you so certain? Blind faith is a funny thing.
Look at historical evidence, then look at what is probable in terms of the evidence.
Your view is based on blind faith, mine is based on history. Who is really assuming?
Again you are assuming they were heretics.
So the Muslim argument is that Bahira and Waraqah are “True Christians” despite the fact that the Arabian pennisula outside of Byzantium was inhabited by heretical Christians such as the Nestorians?
Its not my opinion, its historical probability that suggests what is likely and not mythological.
It is your opinion that these groups were heretical. Also I do not know of ANY Muslim who has made the argument that because these two Christians living Mecca accepted Muhammad as a true Prophet means that is some how some sort of WHOLE Christian validation. Trust me my friend Muslims are FULLY aware that the majority of Christians do not except Muhammad as a prophet, if they did they would be Muslims.
Here is the problem with what Muhammad (and today’s Muslims) have with the word “Christian”.
There were many heretical Christians (Bahira, a Nestorian Christian), and Waraqah who was likewise a member of heretical Christianity since the Quran, the Hadiths and all other records refuse to identify his theological orthodoxy.
Waraqah accepted Muhammad as a prophet, so did Bahira. But the problem s that Muslims believe this is Christian validation of Muhammad as prophet when its not.
it’s a figure of speech which I assume you have never heard before.
LOL even if you consider yourself and Unbeliever, I am not lying when I tell you the stance of Islam towards Christians. Christians are not Pagan i.e Unbelievers they are People of the Book, two different groups being discussed.