Science, belief and faith

“it is being perceived and perceive. It was beautifully before there was that relationship, he realized that, thanks to humanities it will gradually discover much deeper: it is the substance (or in -itself) anywhere, and therefore we can not oppose the man and things. Accordingly to this, it is all our scientific concepts that must be considered as projections of ourselves in the world. In other words, for almost two centuries, we have determinism where there were none! In other words, we are doomed to animism. This does not mean at all that it was wrong. But it does mean that determinism is not the fruit of our projection in the universe. However, you may say, that this determinism is real since it has been proved. It has been proven, but what is shown is not certain. And then there are still a lot of phenomena that can be proven and that we have no idea.

Exactly in the same way, we plan on the universe what we call space. Why? Because we are extended to the perception or the understanding, we will confer the dimensions (length, width, height, etc…) And as it is us who specialized the universe is us who “temporalize” it because we can pose a beginning, middle and an end, that we place at least West, in a chronological sequence, that means, according to a temporality that we represent as an arrow. You see, this thing that explains the world in trying to model or by searching its origin, its evolution and its end is in both cases demonstrate, again, purely and simply of animism. We must conceive, therefore, that the birth and the end of the world, for example the big bang and the final cataclysm have absolutely no reality. When we hear dreamers like Hubert Reeves tell you: “At first there was the big bang, you want to reply:” But

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12