The Interaction Between Philosophy And Justice – A Study By Artur Victoria

Kelsen shows that the Constitution did not represent Plato’s law, but only the production method to govern on the basis of education. The Constitution is an educational content more Platonic than legal or political. After is also the case dual between “good” and “wrong” Plato is a tonic to define his idea of justice as well as Kelsen points out, Plato is not recognized through the sense perception. The object of knowledge is beyond the senses, or is outside the scope of the dialectic experience.

Created by Plato as a philosophical method to improve the Socratic project and intuition of the idea and the effort to find room for criticism about the essential nature of intuition of the idea. The debate is about the dialectic between insights and conclusive on the idea.

He was also the pioneer in the defense of objectivism. The development of a pioneer of the theory of ideas is the first design of the object as a decisive factor between the two members of the training.

It’s hard to disagree with the analysis concluded that there is a conceptual error in Kelsen in the construction of the theory of justice, Plato, the principle of equality, which is part of an initial arbitrary discrimination that is not rational . Thus, while legal, Plato’s Republic would not be legitimate. What Kelsen not realize is that not only the content of the substantive law of the State Constitution that would lead to the decline of the Platonic Justice, but above all, the importance indefinitely regardless of the mechanisms of understanding in the sense of that gives priority to the natural possibility of rationality, which has no religious content decisively. The greater the intelligence would be the prerogative of a few

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6