demonic. If we accept the concept, Mr. Osipov and declare the Church’s teaching on the afterlife journey of souls “like a woman’s tales”, we must create a new funeral service, which would please the souls of the baptism of Christ and the apostles in hell. In addition, if post-mortem treatment of the pagans, infidels and heretics may have something urgent need to introduce a routine church funeral prayers that atheists, pagans, Jews and Moslems to Christ preached in hell. In general, it is the same old teaching apokatastasisa rejected by the Church and anathema to the V Ecumenical Council, but in a different format (it is characteristic that the modernists are trying to rehabilitate Origen, and even prove that he and his false teaching was anathema). How in the hell is baptism? A per capita water will flow, both through the air, without encountering obstacles, to baptize one soul outside the body is as impossible as to baptize a shadow. The Church knows cases when the Lord miraculously extended the life of the dying and even raised the dead to give them the opportunity to take the sacred mysteries, and be clean before he died. And Mr.
Osipov believes that all this can make in hell. Then fantasy modernists weakens and withers, and they begin to talk about baptism by fire. Did the apostles abandoned sinners for atonement in the fire? If the fire can be awakened in the soul of the tortured sinner the love of God, then it is wrong Inquisitors who burned heretics out of mercy for them, because they believed that torture a heretic facilitate his future fate.
Although Mr. Osipov wants to hide his modernist guise antikatolitsizma, but in fact his views on baptism of fire in hell are banal repetition of the Catholic purgatory. St. John