reports showed that only 7,300 new houses were to be built.
This number is alarmingly less than previous years, and is roughly only a third of the figure in the past years. This can be attributed to the structural aspect of sociology in that the government in place has taken deliberate effort to help reduce the number of occupants within the city- Sydney, with aim to help have a people in different cities like Adelaide and Melbourne; this goes a great way to encourage balances developments.
Meanwhile, Melbourne is started construction of 23,000 new dwellings in 2003. Brisbane is set to grown its housing capacity by 13,450 while Adelaide will have 7,500 new homes. Which brings about the question not Sydney?
With more houses in other cities, Sydney’s population is expected to growing by close to 23,000 – which easily makes the dwelling shortage a reality. This also remained the problem because of the historical aspect of sociology in that from the word go, there was poor planning of the city structure so for it to have more construction rezoning processes and infrastructure facilitation must take place.
With this shortage its no doubt that its bad news for renters and those looking to get into the housing property market as inadequate growth in supply will push rents and house prices up this compliments the historical aspect combined with anthropological aspect of sociology since its through that one gets to understand why housing an important element in the countries development is not encouraged.
Elsewhere in Australia, the activity is around normal historic levels, although you can argue that even that’s not enough, given the population and migration growth in those states. Because renters would not be