made using nitrates, sulphates, and phosphates in the soil. When “producers” are eaten by “consumers”, such as animals, the carbohydrates, fats, and proteins contained in them become energy sources for the “consumers”. Dead organisms are consumed by scavengers and decomposers, including fungi and insects, thus recycling nutrients back into the soil.
Most consumers feed on multiple species and in turn, are fed upon by multiple other species to create food webs.Food webs are interdependencies in equilibrium. The question is how did the individuals in these food webs exist before each of the others had “evolved”? There is close dependence such as noted by Darwin himself in that clover needs bees for its existence. They are all connected! If one is removed they will all be affected. This does not help the case for evolution.
Many creatures reproduce asexually. Why would animals abandon simpler asexual reproduction in favour of more costly and inefficient sexual reproduction? Sexual reproduction is a very complex process that is only useful if fully in place. For sexual reproduction, with complimentary male and female sex organs, sperm and eggs and all the associated biological processes in parallel to have “evolved” defies probability. There is no driver, even if genetically possible, for an asexual organisms to “evolve” into “sexual” organisms. Another problem and failure for evolution.
The primates – lemurs, monkeys, apes and man appear fully formed in the fossil record. The proverbial “missing link” between man and ape is still “missing”. The Bible says God created man as a crowning Glory to oversee the world and its animals. In view of the failures of evolution we have seen, it takes less faith to