Lesbians Rule!

prove deleterious to his education.

Moreover it is impossible not to get the impression of how women can be misogynous, since such is rendered efficacious with certain dress; ergo a refusal of the female by refusing to express the female, nominally this is a quantitative event since this brand of misogyny manifests proportionally with the abundance in dress.

Such dress is employed to acquire hindrance to male appreciation as to just what the female is all about, apoptotic misogyny since she refuses female demonstration this important didactic aspect to the female reason of being.

The dress ethos it seems is a projection of female ubiquity here health is paramount prompting subconscious reproach of not being in possession of complete health with all that this implies, this response is testament of genuine inherent female potential.

This, the female imposes on a given social strata and being a psychological majority she pervades the collective unconscious in blaming anyone this resulting in social divisibility with a certain hierarchical value a sort of pseudo-culture or quasi-religion.

Healthier women as it were would feel less the need of superficial props either to scrupulously show to hide herself since they certainly should feel less inadequate, even to the contrary seeing that they more perfectly match Creations eternal idea of the female, which is what one could classify as the eventually feminist archetype.

Clothing can become a weapon ironically leveraged against those very same individuals who promote it, men whose very religious proficiency depends on cognizance of the female, hypocritically deny it and invent rules to dissimulate a

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30