Lesbians Rule!

manifest ignorance, blaming the female but mostly blaming society.

On the other hand, it seems that a timid woman can conveniently appropriate the term of religion only to elaborate a camouflage in order to escape from a non compromising world, religion here suited into a self serving definition engendering a variety of female cast misogyny.

Self hate, or is it the shame of being woman that under the pretext of religious freedom that the female can escape from society but as well escape from the world and natural objective expression a sort of disembodiment.

Proportionally such unnatural props evidently betray the didactic aspect of female demeanour, since the intention of each intervention is a diversion, a sort of mastery by confusion.

So by default the woman is a self inducing victim of her own ubiquity, under the pretext of fame she submits herself to an obsequious masquerade of servility and ridicule.

The male subconsciously knows this and takes advantage, treating the woman as a child and this she may be in positive response, immaturity the winner on the political stage.

Such is evident in the third world or the so called developing countries where the individual is permitted to subsist as the pseudo eternal infant.

Notwithstanding this same default mode exists equally for the male pervading the arena of individuality.

1.4

For the male, lesbianism is no problem since the equivalent of female corporeal sexuality is male cognitive philosophy.

It is evident, as all know that the equivalent to male philosophy is female sensuality, where the progeny of division is transcendence

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30