question of the choosing of the wrong spouses but the sheer incompatibility of ordinary human sentiments with the physical and psychological demands of being a stressed member of the world´s most famous and influential family. Prince Charles therefore, did no more than Princes (and Crown Prince at that), have done throughout the whole of history – given their personal relations a good second place within the demands of the State. The so called neglected Princess who technically benefitted from the association with the Crown to the point of being able to find vent for her passions and altruism, obviously had other concepts of reality. If she had not been the wife of the crown prince she would have not been able to do all those things or perhaps even given much attention and that is a fact tha tmnay people conveniently forget.
Had I not known that there was real conflict and incompatability between them, I could have even imagined that it was all a part of a theatrical act that wins public attention to a cause that thrives on it. It does not take divine inspiration to work that one out. The real problem was not Camilla, who could and would have kept herself in the background like most secret lovers, but Princess Diana´s exaggerated self esteem. Under the circumstances, given such provocation, she was out to prove her own damaged exclusivity, determined to save her pride and private war against those who sought to monopolise or perhaps alienate her father´s love. Perhaps it was not the public at large that worried her, but those within her family who may have made her feel that she was unduly and unreasonably sensitive. Diana did not get on with most members of her family, but it does not mean that she was not an outstandingly affectionate